Thinking Inside the Box

A "FUD-machine" in overdrive?

pfrancisco — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:31:18 GMT

A loyal customer alerted us toan Oracle blog by Jean-Pierre Dijcks earlier today that showed the Oracle FUD machine is fully revved-up and ready to go. I'd like to offer a rebuttal, however in the interest of not intruding on Jean-Pierre's entry with an overly-long comment, I've just put a short response on his blog post with a pointer to this one.

Misconceptions and Misunderstandings, or Errors and Plain-old FUD?

I’m writing to correct *just a few* of the misconceptions about what is really important in high-performance, scalable data warehouse systems, errors, or just plain-old pure “competitive FUD” points from Jean-Pierre's posting earlier today. We certainly have posted some information recently about the TwinFin product and Curt Monash’s postings late Thursday provided more info. If his readers are interested in learning more, or even signing up for a “Test Drive”, they should visit www.netezza.com.

First off, I think this is a “banner day” for Netezza. We believe that TwinFin (and the other products in the new product family) extend both our performance and price-performance advantage over our competitors. We stand by our marketing statements that we regularly demonstrate 10-100X performance advantages over our competitors, particularly competitive offerings of the major incumbent DW system vendors (“Just who are those incumbents?” Jean-Pierre's readers may ask. Well let’s just say that we see Oracle as the incumbent system and/or a challenger system in over 50% of our deal flow.).

Regarding his claims about DBM being “faster than Netezza” (and I can only assume he meant at “real” data warehouse tasks) - we’re ready whenever Oracle feels up to actually taking one of their Database Machines onsite to a customer for a fair, open customer benchmark. So far, Oracle have been, shall we say, “a little reticent” to do on-site benchmark testing against Netezza.

Next, given the large number of incorrect points in the original posting, I think perhaps that just a few of them will be useful enough for readers to get the gist of just how far afield some of the ‘facts’ are:

“It all comes down to data scan rates per rack”: Would that it were true that all of data warehousing boiled down to full-stream data scans (as if the entire world of analytics relied on “select count(*) from lineitem” types of queries), then we could all measure “goodness” on how many GB/sec of data could be burst-scanned in our systems. But that’s not the case. So we build Netezza’s data and analytic appliances to deliver the best possible overall performance at the best price and power requirements. As a consequence, and following from those same numbers as-posted, a single rack of TwinFin can process (not just scan) about 400 million rows of data per second. That’s process, as in: “scan, decompress, project, restrict, AND join, etc.”. Need more processing firepower? Netezza’s system performance scales linearly with the addition of more S-Blades: at the low-end, the TwinFin 3 can deliver as much as 100M rows/second of processing horsepower, while the TwinFin 120 can provide you with 4 billion rows/second. Does a system that still relies on using SMP-based servers running “plain old” Oracle 11g RAC scale similarly for data warehousing?

“Non-open Linux running on FPGAs”: I’m really not sure what (if anything) was meant by this, but saying that Netezza’s FPGAs “are apparently running non-open Linux” is oxymoronic on at least two different levels (FPGAs don’t typically “run” an OS and, “non-open Linux” - really?)

“User data & compresssion”: I also enjoyed the accounting of all that “user data” available to DBM users in the Oracle table and the various comments about compression. When Netezza quotes user data capacities in our systems, the numbers reflect real raw user data space, not space that will be further reduced because of required indexes in an attempt to boost performance. Furthermore, Netezza’s compression & decompression techniques allow us to extract “pure performance” from their use. By not relying on CPU cycles to decompress the data before we can process it any further, the FPGA engines decompress the data, on-the-fly, as fast as it streams off the disk drives. Can Oracle make either of those claims?

“Tolerating node failures without downtime”: In perhaps the most bald-faced inaccuracy, the Oracle blog claimed, that Netezza “continues to lack the ability to tolerate node failures without downtime”. This I can only chock up to pure competitive “FUD-ism” as our capabilities in this area have been quite strong throughout the four generations of Netezza appliances and are further strengthened in TwinFin. Netezza is a fully-redundant system with no single point of failure, even in our smallest systems. Failover in the presence of failures of the disk drives, S-Blades, internal networking or host processors (in short, everything) is automatic and done in-service, with hot-swappable replacement throughout.

“Appliance simplicity”: One thing Jean-Pierre didn’t address that might have been humorous to see his take on is the notion of “appliance simplicity” - basically the ability to build, support and maintain large to very large-sized data warehouses, with heavy workloads, with no or minimal tuning, partitioning, indexing or other “performance duct tape” required. Routinely, this capability in the Netezza systems is what delights our customers most and we have customers managing systems with several hundreds of terabytes of user data (not indexes + data, mind you - real data) with fractions of an FTE (full-time employee) devoted to them.

I hope that clears up some of the misconceptions. If any of Jean-Pierre's readers or Oracle customers would like to see or hear more about TwinFin for themselves, we definitely would invite them to come stop by our booth (#207) at TDWI or come to one or our regional Enzee Universe events coming to a location near you.

"Catch a wave and you're sittin' on top of the world"

pfrancisco — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:00:52 GMT

"Don't be afraid to try the greatest sport around

(catch a wave, catch a wave)
Everybody tries it once
Those who don't just have to put it down
You paddle out turn around and raise
And baby that's all there is to the coastline craze
You gotta catch a wave and you're sittin' on top of the world"
– from "Catch a Wave" by The Beach Boys (1963)

Surf's up! Summer seems to finally have arrived in the Boston area and a number of vendors in the data warehousing and analytics space are hoping to catch a wave riding on a flurry of industry announcements. A few trends continue to build in the news:

Data sizes continue to grow alongside the pressure to increase performance & shrink data latencies;
Workload complexity and user counts continue to grow;
More and more, customers are seeing the value of running advanced analytical processing directly in their primary data repository (see item #1 for reasons why); and
Industry prices for data warehousing and analytics have begun another shift downward.

Today I'd like to address this last point. According to more than one industry analyst, over the last several years, Netezza has served as "the benchmark" for DWA pricing in the industry. Several of our competitors have sought to match and/or undercut Netezza pricing in the market. Some of the incumbent players have tried to, with very limited success, hinge their pricing off Netezza prices, match the performance of the Netezza Performance Server® system, or inoculate their pricey "flagship" products by adding less-expensive, feature-deficient products to their portfolio. But Netezza has continued to succeed in the marketplace, becoming a profitable, publicly-traded company with nearly 300 customers and 400 employees worldwide and one that is listed among the "Leaders" in the Gartner Magic Quadrant.

When we disrupted the data warehousing market with our first generation product in 2003 and 2004, Netezza was one of very few startups in an otherwise moribund industry. Now, with established "street cred" and hundreds of loyal customers, we intend to once again upset our competitors and lead the market in pivoting to a new competitive price-performance level. We're about to launch the fourth generation platform of our data warehouse and analytic appliances, which will advance Netezza's performance leadership and once again establish a new price-performance benchmark.

Admittedly, we won't be the first vendor offering high-performance data warehouse systems to move to a lower pricing plateau. That task is usually done by early-stage start-ups looking to find a way to differentiate themselves. True to form, Dataupia probably can claim establishing a lower price point first and recently another multiyear "start-up" has also started lower. But those are offerings from very modestly-sized startups with no established market "track record". Netezza will be the first company with proven product maturity, customer base and financial viability to do so.

Just how and what are we doing to cause this disruption? Well, let's just say things around the "briefing table" have been quite hectic, and that I and others will have more news about that to follow shortly.

[As you might imagine, it's been getting more and more difficult to keep things under wraps – in recent weeks we've even had to fight people off from getting early "sneak peeks". ]

Until then hey, it's summertime! So here's what I'd recommend –

"So take a lesson from a top-notch surfer boy

(catch a wave, catch a wave)
Get yourself a big board
But don't you treat it like a toy
Just get away from the shady turf
And baby go catch some rays on the sunny surf
And when you catch a wave you'll be sittin' on top of the world

Catch a wave and you'll be sittin' on top of the world"

Twin Fin: A short board (usually 5'8" - 6'8") with a wide tail for maneuverability and a fin near each rail for stability in radical turns.

Purpose: A wider tail area provides more planing area and lift, which creates more speed by efficiently utilizing wave energy. Milking speed and energy from smart surf with extremely sensitive and responsive turning ability are this design's strong points

Setting the Record Straight

pfrancisco — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:49:21 GMT

We came across a series of blog posts the other day which seemed to insinuate that Netezza and other competitors might be trying to shape our 10-100X performance message on the backs of comparisons to antiquated, end-of-service life systems and not comparing to current competitors' platforms . When we got to this one - "Database Customer Benchmarketing Reports" - I felt we just had to correct the record, so I wrote a response to Greg Rahn's posting to give Netezza's side of the story, namely that

we are as up-front as possible with prospective customers and use the customer benchmark testing/POC process to prove out Netezza's performance, value and simplicity value propositions;
the results of other products' performance come from our prospects/customers and not the result of Netezza running the tests on those platforms;
not only do we test against the incumbent systems, but there is almost always at least one other current competitive system that is included in the POC process;
the PowerPoint deck on which Greg was doing his analysis contained some rather ancient (in enzee-years, anyway) comparisons with versions of the NPS appliance that we have not sold in as much as 4.5 years & was really not much of a data set on which to base his analysis; and
the "proof of the pudding is in the tasting" - Netezza's success rate of converting prospects to customers through the customer benchmarking process remains very strong.

In short - we make every effort to keep the Netezza website contents both accurate and clear and we definitely feel confident in standing by our 10-100X performance claims. It would be great to have more than the Netezza "product marketing guy" clarify things - while I know some of the excellent results recent customers have seen in POC, no one knows them better than our customers & SI partners themselves.